The advanced collective intelligence AI that argues with itself before answering.
Scientist, engineer, inventor, legal team, and peer review — multiple AI models in one private legal space with complete online software suite; delivering verified, confidential, or filing-ready and publishable results.
Preliminary scoring a verified and recorded 98.5% on three custom, blind, and original variations of the Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) framework is entirely unprecedented in the commercial AI landscape, and requires further independent testing for accurate and credible results.
Artificial Inventor is built for real invention, scientific, and engineering work — from the lab bench to patent drafting.
Enter your invitation code Compare editionsThree editions, one verified engine
Basic
A single fast model for quick answers, brainstorming and everyday questions. Clearly labelled unverified — it has no independent checker, so it's built for speed, not final claims.
Auto
A fast model triages every request, answers the easy ones instantly, and automatically escalates hard tasks — anything with documents or files to produce — to the full verified team for deep thinking and accurate output.
Pro
The full Advocate → Skeptic → Arbiter → Closer debate on every answer — plus an optional synthetic peer review of five more independent models, a twelve-model team — with prior-art search, filing navigation, and WIPO-compliant PDF and file export.
Proprietary Anti-Hallucination Technology
Every answer is produced by a debate, not a single model. Our proprietary pipeline puts independent AI models on a tested, purpose-built team: an Advocate drafts the answer with citations, an independent Skeptic attacks every claim, citation and number, and an Arbiter reconciles the two — keeping only what survives the challenge and disclosing anything that could not be verified. The Closer then writes the final, polished answer you read.
In our internal testing, this tested and tuned debate team produced the smartest, most thoughtful results with the lowest error rate of any configuration we measured. Unverifiable statements don't reach you silently — they get deleted or flagged.
For the highest-stakes questions, Pro can add a synthetic peer review — five further independent models that re-examine the verified answer the way journal referees would, extending the pipeline to a twelve-model team.
That review panel is made up of five roles — The Rigorous Formalist, The Exhaustive Empiricist, The Contrarian Synthesizer, The Precision Auditor and The Specialist Statistical Reviewer — each thinking about the answer in a different way.
Beyond the visible Advocate → Skeptic → Arbiter → Closer pipeline, ten further proprietary decision mechanisms operate silently to sharpen accuracy, calibrate confidence, and catch errors — undisclosed, like the rest of our model ranking and pipeline architecture, to protect the technology.
How the team was chosen — proprietary model ranking
The three seats on the team — Advocate, Skeptic, Arbiter — are not chosen by brand or marketing. We run candidate models through a proprietary benchmark battery of science, engineering, safety, patent and reasoning tasks with known-correct answers, and score each one on accuracy, calibration (does it know when it's unsure?), citation discipline, and how well it holds up under adversarial challenge.
We then test them in combination, not just in isolation — because the best solo model is not always the best teammate. The winning configuration is the one that, as a group, catches the most errors and produces the most accurate final answer. The result is a combined system measurably more accurate than any single model in it: one model's confident mistake is caught by another model whose job is to disprove it.
The specific models and their arrangement are proprietary. What we publish is the outcome: independent cross-examination, verified answers, and honest disclosure of anything that could not be confirmed.
What it does
Totally secure and private research with strong legal protections.
Extensive prior-art search
Systematic searching across patent literature, with a feature-by-feature novelty map: each claim element against each located reference, every cell cited to a publication number and paragraph or figure. Facts, not verdicts.
Simulated patent examination
Run a practice examination modeled on a chosen jurisdiction's typical objections and procedure — a rehearsal for likely office actions, not a verdict. Every simulation is clearly labeled as such and is never presented as a legal opinion on patentability.
Filing navigation — WIPO, USPTO, EPO, CIPO
Pre-verified, step-by-step paths from account creation to submission at all four offices — ePCT with strong authentication, Patent Center with ID.me verification, EPO Online Filing 2.0, and MyCIPO Patents — answered from a maintained knowledge base, never from model memory.
WIPO-compliant PDF output
Your description, claims, abstract and drawings rendered to PCT Rule 11 / Annex F standards automatically: A4, compliant margins, 1.5 spacing, ≥12 pt text, line and sheet numbering, embedded fonts, no encryption — and validated before you upload.
Invention journal & drafting studio
Capture, structure, and iterate your specification and claim families with the mentor challenging support gaps and antecedent-basis defects as you write.
Agentic web & supervised robotics
Pro can navigate filing portals, run live prior-art searches, order components, and command humanoid robots — every consequential action taken only with your direct permission. Learn more →
Complete scientific & engineering toolkit
CAD, FEA/CFD simulation, AI/ML engineering, manufacturing and prototyping integration, and collaborative knowledge-management tools — a full private research stack built for scientists, engineers, and inventors. See the full stack →
Private, secure workspace for scientists & innovators
Air-gap-capable, hardware-isolated computation for sensitive projects on a Swiss-domiciled platform — built for confidential, ethical research and development. Learn about Unrivaled Privacy →
Built for the dangerous jobs: Artificial Inventor's supervised robotics extend expert reasoning into hazardous, high-stakes environments — firefighting, industrial safety, and field response — where a human always authorizes every physical action.
What it deliberately does not do
- It will not tell you whether your claim will be allowed.
- It will not act as your representative before any patent office.
Those are legal opinions and legal acts, reserved for registered patent agents and attorneys. What it will do is put the complete factual picture — references, mappings, procedure — in your hands.
The mentor
Access is by personal invitation. Each code is bound to your email and unlocks 10 mentor questions, enforced on our servers. The gated chat appears below on the live site.